Maybe at another time, or when the society is more democratic, kinder and more open to these kind of views. Nobody wants to be on those kind of lists even when they deserve to be there.
So, thanks again and I hope you all understand why I just had to give this a miss. I apologise for having to this about turn - my bad, my mistake, sometimes adrenaline runs ahead of reason. However, I think I can share what under performing CEOs have in common. That way, you will be able to spot them a mile away.
Again, I will not include those companies already driven to PN17, or CEOs being prosecuted already by SC.
These under performing CEOs have a strong denominator running through them: a lack of focus on cost of capital. This is the biggest factor to me. The corporate problems mainly stemmed from poor judgments on how capital is deployed and how to extract proper returns and create value.
The second thing is warped understanding of leverage. There are plenty of companies who over gear all the time, be it in a bull cycle or recession, they will always be grappling with huge debt, which in the end just eats away at value creation.
The third thing is jumbled acquisitions. There is a difference in being a conglomerate with viable, well run units, and somebody who has a mish mash of businesses, making it difficult to value or manage. Its tough enough to run a business in one industry well. When you have more than three of four, its silly to think you can execute just as well or have the breadth of talent to do so.
The fourth thing is CEOs who are more content to enrich themselves first, way before the shareholders. They usually have a total disregard for respecting minority interests. They engage in not quite so arms-length type of transactions.
The fifth is poor execution, the inability to move the company to the next level. The inability to do long term value creation. The inability to deliver consistently.
p/s photos: Chrissie Chau
0 comments:
Post a Comment