Showing posts with label Fiona Xie. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Fiona Xie. Show all posts

Further Updates On Notion Vtec & KPJ

As I have been following both shares closely, I will comment on recent developments on both companies, which are really quite interesting.

Fiona Xie


This announcement is dated 6 January 2010.
Announcement Details :

Table 1
Name of DirectorName of Registered Holder
Date of Acquisition
Purchase Price per share
Number of Ordinary Shares of RM0.50 each acquired
% of Issued Shares#
Thoo Chow FahChoo Wai Sook 6 January 2010
RM2.75
100,000*
0.07*


Comment: A director buying at RM2.75. Its not a significant size, but the timing is significant.

Type
:
Announcement
Subject
:
NOTION VTEC BERHAD (“NVB” or “Company”)
Private placement of up to ten percent (10%) of the issued and paid-up share capital of the Company (“Private Placement”)

Contents
:
Further to our earlier announcements made on the Private Placement, HwangDBS Investment Bank Berhad, on behalf of the Board of Directors of NVB, is pleased to announce that the Company has on 6 January 2010 fixed the issue price for the new 13,844,694 ordinary shares of RM0.50 each in NVB (“NVB Shares”) to be issued pursuant to the Private Placement (“Placement Shares”) at RM2.44 per Placement Share. The issue price of RM2.44 per Placement Share represents a discount of approximately 10% to the volume weighted average market price of NVB Shares for the five (5) market days immediately preceding 6 January 2010 of RM2.7066.

Details of the placee, who is a strategic corporate investor, will be announced upon the completion of the Private Placement, which is expected to be no later than 20 January 2010.

This announcement is dated 6 January 2010.

Finally, supposed to be in December, about one month late. Its whom will be taking up the placement which will be important, not the price. Please read posting on Notion Vtec back in October:

http://malaysiafinance.blogspot.com/2009/10/why-i-like-notion-vtec-tons-of.html

Fiona Xie


Type
:
Announcement
Subject
:
KPJ HEALTHCARE BERHAD (“KPJ” OR “COMPANY”)

ACQUISITION BY KUMPULAN PERUBATAN (JOHOR) SDN. BHD. (“KPJSB”), A WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY OF KPJ OF 40,800,000 ORDINARY SHARES OF RM1.00 EACH, REPRESENTING 51% EQUITY INTEREST IN SMC HEALTHCARE SDN BHD (“SMCH”) FROM SABAH MEDICAL CENTRE SDN BHD (“SMC”) FOR A CASH CONSIDERATION OF RM51,000,000 (“PROPOSED ACQUISITION”)

Contents
:
The Board of Directors of KPJ (“Board”) wishes to announce that KPJSB, which is a wholly-owned subsidiary of KPJ, had on 6 January 2010 entered into the following agreements:-

(a) a conditional Share Sale Agreement (“SSA”) with SMC for the acquisition of 40,800,000 ordinary shares of RM1.00 each (“Sale Shares”) which is equivalent to 51% of equity interest in SMCH from SMC for a cash consideration of RM51,000,000 (“Purchase Consideration”);

(b) Shareholders Agreement with SMC to regulate their relationship as shareholders of SMCH; and

(c) Management Agreement with SMCH for the appointment of KPJ to manage the existing private and the new private hospitals of SMCH.

The details of the announcement are as per attached.

This announcement is dated 6 January 2010.


Comment: Very interesting announcement during the share split and ex period for bonus and free warrants. How significant is the acquisition. Well, industry insiders will tell you that there were a lot of bidders for SMCH, and for KPJ to even get 51% is nothing short of a coup. 51% for RM51m, have you tried building a hospital now for less than RM150m??? ... thats why its a coup.


p/s photos: Fiona Xie

Genting Singapore In Cairo - Some Perspective Please


Genting Singapore said on Tuesday that one of its subsidiaries has been selected as the new operator of a casino in Egypt. The firm said Genting Casinos, an indirect wholly-owned unit of Genting UK, has entered into a casino concession agreement with Misr Hotels. Genting UK has been awarded the casino concession for The Nile Ritz Carlton Hotel in Cairo for an initial period of 10 years. It plans to open the new operation under the brand "Crockfords on the Nile".

The move is part of Genting's strategy to expand its casino resort network. It will also strengthen and develop Genting UK's position in the premium market through its key high-end London casino clubs, Crockfords, Colony and Maxims.

The Nile Hotel, located on the banks of the Nile and in the heart of the Egyptian capital of Cairo, will undergo a major refurbishment. The hotel is considered one of the iconic developments in Cairo which has contributed to the Egyptian travel industry since it first opened in 1958.

Renovation work is expected to be completed in early 2012. Genting said the Casino concession agreement is not expected to have any material impact on its earnings in the current financial year.

My Take: If my readers can remember, in September last year I went to Cairo and had a zen moment with my camel boy. Anyway, yes, I did visit the casino as I was just as surprised as anyone that there were casinos in Cairo.

There are about 25 casinos in Cairo already. Each casino has to be within an "approved hotel", usually only one floor or a section of one floor.

All casinos in Cairo are not open to Egyptians but only to tourists, and naturally those of Islamic faith are prohibited as well. Let me tell you that the actual number of people playing there were very few. You almost can have the table all to yourself, and I am not kidding.

Hence all the casinos have less than 10 tables and less than 20 slot machines. The actual impact of having one at Nile Ritz Carlton Hotel is that it will be glitzy, but let me assure you that at any one time you will find less than 20 people playing and you can probably only put in 20 tables max. Anymore tables will just be a waste.

One of the bigger casinos in Cairo is Inter-Casino at the Ramses Hilton Hotel. It has 18 tables and 42 slots. Another is Casino Royal at Movenpick Jolie Ville Resort (yes, Movenpick) with 16 table games and the biggest number of slot machines at 154. The other big one is Taba Hilton & Casino with 19 table games and 76 slot.

Hence people should not be overly excited with the Cairo project, not when there are already 25 operators, and all catering to tourists. This is like adding two gaming tables at Resorts World, seriously folks. The problem is not with Ritz Carlton or Genting, its the number of tourists that actually visit Cairo, and spread that out to over 25 casinos in the one city - that's the problem.

Yes, being with Nile Ritz Carlton is probably the grandest of the lot, and on the Nile some more. But, do you know how many 5-6 star hotels there are on the Nile already - Four Season Cairo Nile Plaza, Intercontinental City Stars, Sheraton, Sofitel, etc... Its just another one.


p/s photo: Fiona Xie

Big & Juicy (Or Is It Dicey) IPOs - Sands China & UC Rusal



Sands China, the Macau casino operations owned by Las Vegas Sands (LVS), yesterday kicked off the roadshow for its Hong Kong initial public offering with the aim of raising between HK$19.41 billion and HK$25.96 billion ($2.5 billion to $3.4 billion). The launch came on the same day that China Minsheng Banking also launched its $3.6bn IPO, which looks set to become the largest Hong Kong listing so far this year.

The institutional tranche for Sands Asia, accounting for 90 percent of the shares, has apparently been "multiple times" oversubscribed. The Macau unit of billionaire Sheldon Adelson's casino company will offer locally 10 percent of its 1.87 billion shares at between HK$10.38 and HK$13.88. It costs around HK$5,608 for a lot of 400 shares. Sands China will spend 42 percent of the net proceeds on repaying shareholder loans and inter-company payables, and one-fourth on the completion of Parcels 5 and 6 in Cotai.

Michael Leven, chief operating officer of Las Vegas Sands, said as a growth company, Sands China requires a certain amount of earnings to be retained to develop the Cotai project. Sands China will seriously consider more rapid growth or dividend issuance only after the monetization strategy kicks in. Chairman Sheldon Adelson said Sands China will sell the non-core assets such as shopping malls and serviced apartments. The capitalization rate on malls will increase as they take time to benefit from full hotel operations. He said net debt will drop from 2.86 times to around 2.3 times on the offering day while the full operation of Parcels 5 and 6 in 2012 will further bring its leverage to below one time.bankers argue that Sands China could be the ticket.

The casino operator, which is owned by Las Vegas gaming magnate Sheldon Adelson and holds one of six casino licences in Macau, already controls about 30% of the mass market and is raising money that will go partly towards the re-starting of a development project on the Cotai Strip that was halted last year as the parent company was running out of cash. According to syndicate analysts, the company is also in a prime position to capitalise on any growth in retail spending by Chinese visitors to Macau as it operates about 74% of all grade-A retail space available in the former Portuguese colony.

As I considered the Wynn Macau offering to be an avoid, and a purer gaming play, hence my view on Sands China is even bleaker - although I think their Marina Bay unit is more attractive if you can hive that out. Big offerings like this are market-timed vehicles, it can cause you to lose a lot of money (e.g. going 10%-20% below IPO) if you get caught in a wrong market mood when its actually listed. But at the same time can get you 10% (looks to be the topside considering the size of the offering) upside if the market mood stays good.

A more combustible and heady IPO, closely watched by all foreign media, is the listing of UC RUSAL, a vehicle owned by one of Russia's favoured sons, Oleg Deripaska. Well, they can't list in Russia for now owing to the market sentiment there. Surprisingly, they bypassed London as well, which was considered as a natural for a company like this.

Before a planned $2 billion Hong Kong IPO in December, the world's largest aluminum producer UC RUSAL is close to a deal to restructure $7.4 billion in debt to foreign banks, according to The Wall Street Journal. Controlled by Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska, the aluminum producer is expected to announce the deal as early as next week, which will allow it seven years to repay $16 billion of debt. HK regulators are expected to give the green light to RUSAL's listing on November 19.

United Company RUSAL is the world leader in the aluminum industry sector, implementing the full production cycle from the extraction of bauxites to the manufacture of primary aluminum and alloys. The company has operations on five continents and in 19 countries around the world. The market share of the company encompasses approximately 12% of the entire global output of primary aluminum and 15% of the world’s alumina production, the necessary raw materials for manufacturing.

United Company RUSAL was founded in March 2007 by the merger and consolidation of RUSAL, SUAL, and the alumina assets of the Swiss company Glencore. Currently the company is comprised of 15 aluminum smelters, 12 alumina refineries, 7 bauxite mines, 3 foil rolling mills, and power-generating assets. UC RUSAL employs more than 100,000 persons at within its structure.

The Russian billionaire is in the final stages of agreeing a restructuring deal with foreign creditors on $7.3bn in debts, a vital precondition for the initial public offering valued at between $1bn and $2.5bn to go ahead. But even if the tycoon reaches agreement in time for a key November 19 hearing at the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, he must still race to win creditor committee approval from the more than 70 banks by the end of November and then market the sale to investors in the two weeks left before most leave for Christmas in mid-December.

It would be the first time a big Russian company has listed on the HK bourse, but they should perhaps first ask why Mr Deripaska is not going straight to London - long the natural harbour for large commodities groups seeking funds on the market. What is the attraction of HK, if not the lure of easy money and bucket loads of liquidity and enormous interest from China over resource plays? All adds up to a recipe for a big truckload of bad things waiting to happen - too eager, too much backslapping, too many wink-wink nods, ...

Could it have anything to do with his problems in the UK, where he is facing legal action, including a suit in the high court from a former partner in Rusal claiming massive compensation? Clearly, the uncertainty surrounding a case that could potentially cost Rusal up to $4bn is mathematical sum that is hard to put inside research reports. The last-minute withdrawal of Goldman Sachs as a lead adviser on the IPO underlines the risks surrounding what would be one of the biggest offerings of the year. Goldman Sachs withdrew as a lead adviser just one week before the company filed its initial application to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on October 2, because it said it needed more time to familiarise itself with the deal, people close to the situation said. That should be the key already, where in the world would Goldman Sachs relinquish the right to lead a massive IPO if not for "graver concerns".

Mr Deripaska, once Russia’s richest man, has been dogged by issues surrounding his past partnerships in the Russian aluminium industry in the 1990s, a time when it was racked by crime. He is being sued by one former partner, Michael Cherney, in London’s High Court for a stake in his UC Rusal; Mr Deripaska contends he owes nothing to Mr Cherney, who he claims was not a partner but ran a protection racket to extort money out of his company. Mr Cherney denies any ties to organised crime.

IPOs being IPOs, in HK the IPO market is in full swing, issues are very huge, they suck up a lot of liquidity - anything untoward happening to just one could derail the overall markets for s sustained period, and will affect capital flows negatively for the rest of Asia. Enough said ....


p/s photo: Fiona Xie Wan Yu

Obamafying Japan, The Democratic Party of Japan (Part 2)



    Overview: Early lower house election results indicate that the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) has defeated the long-ruling Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) in a landslide victory. Prime Minister Taro Aso and the LDP had grown unpopular due to their response to Japan's economic woes. Though a new ruling party may not transform Japan's economy overnight, it is a step towards reform and brings many new (and much younger) faces to government in Japan.

    Election Results

  • The Nikkei reports that early results indicate the DPJ winning 308 of the Lower House's 480 seats. A minimum of 241 seats is required to capture a simple majority. The DPJ has won even more seats than the popular Junichiro Koizumi and his "band of reformists" won for the LDP in 2005.
  • NHK estimates that voter turnout was around 69% and was the highest turnout since the current electoral system was introduced in 1996.
  • DPJ President Yukio Hatoyama will be elected the country's new prime minister in a special Diet session in mid-September.
  • This will be the first time since 1955 that the LDP is not the controlling party in parliament.
  • DPJ President Yukio Hatoyama announced in a press conference that the DPJ will begin discussions with the Social Democratic Party and the People's New Party to form a coalition government.
  • Prime Minister Taro Aso indicated that he will step down as party head. Additionally, LDP's Secretary General, Hiroyuko Hosoda informed Prime Minister Taro Aso that he plans to step down.
  • On a Tokyo Broadcasting System (TBS) televised interview, Hatoyama stated that the DPJ would quickly compile an extra budget to restructure the current government's last stimulus package.
  • The Nikkei reports that Hatoyama said the DPJ government would soon organize a grand policymaking body called the National Strategy Office which will outline Japan's national budget and set the nation's foreign and security policies.
  • Kyodo News projections show the following LDP heavyweights have lost their seats: Ex-Finance Minister Shoichi Nakagawa, current Finance Minister Kaoru Yosano, Ex-Defense Fumio Kyuma, another ex-Defense Minister Yuriko Koike, and Consumer Affairs Minister Seiko Noda.
  • Bloomberg reports that former Prime Minister Toshiki Kaifu lost his seat in the Aichi prefecture against a candidate half his age. Kaifu is the first former prime minister to be voted out since Tanzan Ishibashi in 1963.
  • Ex-Prime Minister's son, Shinjiro Koizumi, is expected to provide the LDP a win in the Kanagawa No. 11 constituency.
  • Eriko Fukuda a 28-year-old member of the DPJ, is projected to win the Nagasaki No. 2 constituency from former Defense Minister Fumio Kyuma. Fukuda is known for filing a lawsuit against the government for people that contracted hepatitis C from tainted blood products. She herself contracted hepatitis C as a child from a blood transfusion.
  • NHK reports that Akihiro Ota, head of the New Komeito party and a partner of the ruling coalition, lost his seat in the Tokyo No. 12 electoral district.
  • Kyodo News reports that 23 people were arrested on suspicion of election law violations.
  • What Will a DPJ Win Mean for the Economy?

  • Heizo Takenaka, former Finance Minister under Koizumi, notes, "Japan's politics and its economy are just not sustainable in their current forms...something has to give, be it the ruling party, the yen, the bond market, the stock market or a combination thereof."
  • Naomi Hasegawa, Senior Fixed Income Strategist, Mitsubishi Debt Research Division: The DPJ promises to shun U.S. dollar bonds if elected.
  • Sentaku Magazine: "The DPJ's announced economic policy may be summarized as one of 'reckless spending.' It calls for, among other things, making all expressways free of tolls, giving every child 26,000 yen a month until he or she finishes the nine years of compulsory education and providing compensation for farmers who have to sell their products below cost. It is estimated that these policies would cost an estimated 20.5 trillion yen in fiscal 2012."
  • The LDP proposed to outspend the DPJ, but the DPJ seemed more likely to rebalance economic growth towards domestic demand. JGB issuance was likely to increase with fiscal expansion regardless of which party won.
  • Though the DPJ promises it won't hike the consumption tax for another four years, it is highly likely it will need to do it earlier because tax revenues may not keep up with increased government expenditure.
  • What Will a DPJ Win Mean for Domestic and Foreign Politics?

  • DPJ wants to turn the bureaucrat-driven government into a more cabinet-driven one.
  • Gerald Curtis, FT Columnist: "The DPJ talks about replacing bureaucrats with politicians in key ministerial positions but says virtually nothing about what policies these newly empowered politicians would implement.".
  • Japan may become slightly more pacifist and less pliant to the U.S..
  • American Enterprise Institute fellows Dan Blumental and Gary Schmitt believe, "Tokyo's foreign policy is unlikely to change drastically," but caution that "the fact that Japan will now have truly competitive political parties means that Japanese policy makers will be more attuned to public opinion.".

p/s photo: Fiona Xie

Looking Back On Returns



For the first quarter of 2009 I don't think I recommended to look at any one stock as I was not convinced of a rally or a substantive run. The good thing about blogging is that your views are all there to be examined, scrutinsed and criticised ... but it also allows you to reflect and note how your views evolve. Like a diary, the most notable postings started around April 24 this year (can go and check). Its fun to look at how things have turned out, bearing in mind that my assertion that stocks I like should have at least a 30% upside within 6 months, so far so good. If I can get a batting average of 65%, I am happy. There are not many runs in a year for a market like Malaysia, once its there, you have to seize the day and then exit when things are looking dowdy. Usually you can count on 2 runs a year lasting anywhere from 4 -15 weeks each time. Bull markets do not make us smarter, it makes picking winners easier.

FBM 100 Gainers and Losers In August 2009
Top 20 Gainers TR
IJM LAND BHD 23.13%
MULTI-PURPOSE 20.93%

SARAWAK OIL PALMS 18.57%

PROTON HOLDINGS BHD 12.13%

SUNWAY CITY BHD 11.51%

TITAN CHEMICALS CORP BHD 11.32%

MAH SING GROUP BHD 9.78%

BOUSTEAD HEAVY INDUSTRIES CO 9.66%

LINGKARAN TRANS KOTA HLDGS 7.57%

AXIATA GROUP BERHAD 7.14%

SELANGOR PROPERTIES BERHAD 7.14%

AEON CO (M) BHD 6.67% UBG BHD -4.94%

KUALA LUMPUR KEPONG BHD 6.40%

TAN CHONG MOTOR HOLDINGS BHD 5.95%

EON CAPITAL BHD 5.60%

AFFIN HOLDINGS BERHAD 5.56%

GUINNESS ANCHOR BHD 5.48%

AMMB HOLDINGS BHD 4.78%

PETRONAS DAGANGAN BHD 4.78%

PPB GROUP BERHAD 4.63%


Source: Bloomberg Note: TRs (total returns), CG (capital gain) & DY (div yield)


Looking Back

April 24 - Confirmation of A Bull Run For Bursa

April 24 - Stocks & Sectors I Like As CI Breaches 1,000
(Property: SP Setia, UEM Land, even Talam, Sunway City, even MK Land. Financials: AMMB, EON Cap). ... safe to say that these property and financial picks outperformed the market substantially ... so far
April 27 - Talam Coming Out Of PN17 0.08 ... had a good run for a while even at 0.14 or 0.15 at some point I believe, still the run should come when its officially out of PN17
April 28 - MK Land Is Pretty Oversold 0.28
... now at 0.40 but went as high as 0.47, we got our 30% or more
May 1 - Sell In May & Go Away
" History repeats itself for a reason, because they do, people never learn and they keep repeating their actions and decisions time in time out. This is the same posting I did 4 years back in May 2006, and repeated this in May 2008, so for all intents and purposes, I should also repost this for May 2009. Personally, I don't think this May-August will be a down period."
May 5 - Stock Picks For A Nice Trade
... these were ok performers, not spectacular, its for a quick trade, if it works good, if not, get out...
SAAG long up to 0.29
Sapuracrest long up to 1.24
IOI Corp long up to 4.50
Kulim-WB long up to 3.32
Kulim long up to 6.00

May 7 - Go Long On The Brokers .. these were good runs, TA went to 1.27 (now 1.20), Affin went to 2.04 (now 1.88), ECM went to 0.78 (now 0.63), HDBS went to 1.75 (now 1.58), Kenanga went to 0.75 (now 0.65), OSK went to 1.58 (now 1.39)
TA long up to 1.03

TA-WB long up to 0.06
Affin long up to 1.77
Affin-WC up to 0.14
ECM long up to 0.66
HDBS long up to 1.45
Kenanga up to 0.68
OSK long up to 1.38

May 29 - Why I Like Pelikan 0.98
... possibly the best call so far, now still at 1.52, we got our 30% here
June 4 - A Timely Look At B-Land & B-Toto 3.26 / 4.74
.. both did well, especially B-Land
June 11 - Tanjong, This One Can Buy & Hold 13.00
... now at 15.82, up 21% so far, a bit more to go to get our 30%
June 11 - Whoops! There It Is (GenM) 2.90
... now at 2.79, not good, I would cut now ..
June 23 - I Like Green Packet At Current Levels 0.70
... very good entry levels at 0.70, now share price still at 0.705 but I get 1 right and 1 warrant basically FREE for every 2 shares, great return, easily way past 30%
July 13 - Market Commentary - "I don't like many stocks now as I think markets do look tired, but if you point a gun to my head to force me to buy one stock to hold till rest of they year, I would probably say E&O" 1.04 ...if anybody read this closely, they would have made a bundle, went ballistic today to a high of 1.52
July 17 - Why I Would Buy Astro Now 3.62
.. 3.43 now, news did not filter out as I had hoped, wishy washy developments, sell
July 24 - Why I Am Keen On MPHB Now 1
.58 ... 2.11 now, we got 33%, enough
August 4 - Why I Like DRB Hicom 1.13 ... went towards 1.30 but fizzled out, still very keen on this, can hold on
August 12 - Why I Like IJM Land 1.81
... went to 2.05, now at 1.98, will wait for my 30%
August 21 - Why I Like Bumi-Commerce Bank 10.30
...recent call...
August 27 - Why I Like QL Resources 3.34 ...recent call ...


The above were views on stocks and sectors that I like, not an invitation to buy or sell. It serves as a blogging activity of my investing thoughts and ideas, this does not represent an investment advisory service as I charge no subscription or management fees (donations are welcomed though). The content on this site is provided as general information only and should not be taken as investment advice. All site content, shall not be construed as a recommendation to buy or sell any security or financial instrument. The ideas expressed are solely the opinions of the author. Any action that you take as a result of information, analysis, or commentary on this site is ultimately your responsibility. Consult your investment adviser before making any investment decisions.


p/s photo: Fiona Xie


Foreign Funds Flow



Suddenly foreign media is picking up on a surge in the flow of funds into Asian markets. Any truth in that?

----------------
Foreign fund managers are banking heavily on an Asian earnings upturn and continual growth in China to drive market momentum forward. Following a lull, a sudden leap on Wall Street has boosted foreign investor interest in Asian markets. The psychology of the markets has changed from the fear of losing money to a fear of losing opportunities.

According to EPFR Global fund research, US$137.5 billion flowed out of money market funds and almost a fifth went into Asian and other emerging market funds in the second quarter. The trend has continued in recent weeks, although the size of inflows is subsiding. MSCI Asia ex-Japan rose by 34 per cent year-to- date to July 24 and emerging by 46 per cent in US dollars, but lower gains in euro and sterling. Credit Suisse said there are several positive fundamental factors which support foreign investment in Asia.

Asia is expected to lead the global recovery due to its low leverage and financial flexibility to pump-prime economies. Second, China and India are growth engines. Third, emerging Asia is projected to deliver an average earnings recovery of 33 per cent in 2010, according to the Institutional Brokers Estimate System. Finally, company directors are signaling earnings upgrades.

Recovery leaders include companies which benefit from the massive fiscal stimulus packages in China and selected Asian countries, and technology companies with the largest potential earnings rebound. Credit Suisse advises that the collapse in Asian and global trade was a function of falling final demand and liquidation of bloated inventories.

The Asian stockmarket boom has been a boon to fund managers who had a dreadful time between 2007 and spring of 2009. Over twelve months, MSCI ex-Japan is still down 26 per cent in US dollars. Thus, the 2009 rebound has only profited investors who entered the market this year and reduced the pain of others.

Jason McCay and Richard Evans who manage the Martin Currie Asia Fund, a hedge fund, are focusing on companies that concentrate on the domestic markets. They increased exposure to Chinese banks and have purchased residential Chinese developer Guangzhou R&F Properties. Bullish on coal, they have bought Bumi Resources in Indonesia and have also invested in the Indian property sector through Unitech. They are concerned, however that the market surge has been caused by a surplus of liquidity. 'Valuations are no longer cheap and many companies are already pricing in a meaningful recovery in profits.'

Aberdeen Asia Pacific Fund contends that equities 'appear to have run ahead of earnings and economic fundamentals and a pullback would be healthy.' Longer-term, Asia's sounder economic fundamentals will enable it to bounce back more strongly than the West'. Top stocks include OCBC, Jardine Strategic Holding, Samsung Electronics, China Mobile and Singapore Telecommunications and Singapore Technologies.

Andrew Beal, fund manager of Henderson Asia Pacific Capital Growth, notes that aggressive government policies, loose monetary conditions and a steady improvement in economic activity have all helped to drive markets higher since March. Taking a long-term view, he says there is growing awareness among Asian governments over-reliance on exports to the West has become a structural weakness. It needs to be addressed by stimulating domestic consumption.


-------------

I do think stock prices have run a bit ahead of fundamentals. I do think the worst of the global crisis is behind us, although I do think Central & Eastern Europe still has some ways to go. Why are markets so inherently bullish now? You still get the majority of "experts" claiming that things are a bit too much, and yet they still keep running. Not just in Asia but look at the US equity markets in recent weeks.

I believe the answer lies in the massive liquidity on the sidelines. The massive liquidity stem from the government printing presses and various fiscal stimulus programs. Now that risk aversion has subsided somewhat, now that the bigger US banks seem to be on better footing, investors are more willing to place their bets ... no more bloody T-bills.

Naturally in such a situation liquidity would seek out the most liquid of assets. While bashed down property prices in the US might look attractive, its liquidity and gestation period may require a bit more patience. Most investors probably think its a better whack to trade the markets than to buy a depressed property now as you might have some time to wait out the property cycle. Even though many might be getting a bargain in the US property markets, getting a decent rental is another thing, getting a paying tenant that won't turn into a non-paying tenant quickly is another problem. All said, equity seems to be the only channel for these funds to trickle in.

In Malaysia, do not be fooled by the huge surge in the new index since launching because the index is very very skewed. Take the top 10 stocks and see their performance over the last 2 weeks and you will know what I mean. There has been a strategy to make the new index "look good", yes... there might have been some rebalancing by indexed funds as well ... but ... So, local equity market has not been as bullish as the new index would want you to be thinking. Its a rotational market, not entirely convincing... just look at weekly turnover value week by week for the last 6 weeks, you will find a distinctive trend... and you should be able to draw your own conclusions.


p/s photos: Fiona Xie


Which Is Worse?



I hate it a lot when I come across corrupt cops, but what if you get stupid cops? If you have to choose, always choose the corrupt ones because the stupid ones can kill you accidentally with just an "... oops".

Earlier in the week in HK, a few police officers were trying to stop 14 cars which were racing furiously with each other in Kwun Tong at around 2am ... I guess , much like the Federal Highway after 11pm (oh, btw, don't ever drive on the extreme right lane after 11pm on Federal Highway ... its meant for mini-Protons and Peroduas trying to turn Federal Highway into an autobahn). Anyway back to the story, these police officers stopped 5 cars (3 taxis, a truck and a private car) to help create a roadblock to stop the racing cars. That is still alright, the stupid thing was that the police asked the drivers of the 5 cars to remain in their cars!!! According to The Standard, it was more like the drivers were forced to remain in their cars. Mind you, its supposed to be a roadblock and you were going to be watching and waiting for 14 cars coming at you ...

End result, 6 out of the 14 cars that were racing each other plowed into the roadblock. Surprisingly, only 5 drivers were arrested, one even managed to run away while the other 8 cars made a u-turn and zoomed away to freedom. One of the 3 taxi drivers reported that one cop told him that he was just following orders and the driver should complain with his commander.

The Police Commissioner has not reprimanded anyone or sacked anyone yet. The rule of law is that cars being used by the police or under police direction is not covered by insurance, and will have to be claimed from the police. The Police Force in HK is lucky in that none of the 5 decent members of the public died acting as roadblocks. If they did, the insurance company will surely not pay for "accidental death". The policemen will be sued for manslaughter. The Police Force will be sued for compensation and derided as callous idiots.

The case could have greater ramifications if people had died as part of the roadblock. Do you charge the drivers that were racing? Do you charge the police officers? I guess both, and I wouldn't want to be the presiding judge here as attributing blame and cause would be extremely tricky.

Naturally the public were outraged, while at the same time making deserving sarcastic comments about those police officers. Its mind numbingly stupid. Would the officers had asked their own children or parents to remain in the cars in the roadblock???

Police Commissioner Tang King-shing made a public apology following public outcry over the crackdown on illegal road racing early on Monday morning which had was said to endanger the safety of other motorists. Tang said preliminary investigation showed police had made mistakes when they planned the operation. The commissioner said police thoroughly considered the personal safety of the public before they conducted any operation. But he made an apology to those who were injured during the impromptu action against illegal racers on the Kwun Tong bypass which had resulted in pile-up and chase on the highway, leading to six people being injured including a taxi driver and two police officers. In the incident, five racers, aged between 23 and 26, were arrested for furious driving.


p/s photos: Fiona Xie

Some Dirty Tricks By (Unscrupulous) Financial Planners


Like I said before, every profession has their bad hats. The new-fangled financial planners are no different. Here are some tricks to watch out for:

Dirty little secret #1

Many financial planners work to sales targets. For these planners the need to increase revenues is included in financial planners' key performance indicators or in their job descriptions.

In some cases these targets may be a figure - say $55,000 in revenue generated a quarter, breaking down to roughly $7000 a week. The way a planner gets to these targets is not by selling advice; it is by selling products with up-front fees and commissions.

Dirty little secret #2

Some banks' financial planners are ranked in "league tables'' based on who sells the most. This little secret blows away any thoughts that Joe Blow planner is a disinterested adviser.

If major planning groups keep and internally publish league tables on how their financial planners are performing in terms of "sales'' it is hard to see a workforce being motivated to offer impartial financial advice. It cements the above-mentioned industry bias towards sales people rather than advisers.

Dirty little secret #3

In the boom years, a planner on a $60,000 salary could earn up to $70,000 on top of that in commission-based payments.

Yes, we have heard a lot about commissions. Yes, we hear that commissions can lead financial planners to offer products they may not actually believe in.

But I wonder whether we fully understand that a planner regularly offering investors advice that is not attached to some form of commission are flirting with half their likely annual salary.

Dirty little secret #4

You can't go outside the system. I have spoken to two planners who left big planning groups because they felt they were unable to offer the advice they were required to (that is, sell more stuff) rather than the advice they felt they should professionally offer people (for example, go into a term deposit).

In both cases the planners say they were counselled about their perceived failure to convert existing clients into lucrative purchasers of commission-based products.

Dirty little secret #5

Churning = earning. A planner looking to lift earnings can simply recommend new clients switch from one superannuation fund to another. While this bumps the revenue up nicely for the planner, it has some particularly nasty consequences for the unwitting client.

One, they may lose the life insurance contained in the original industry superannuation. Two, if the planner offers a substitute insurance policy they frequently get the handsome up-front commissions on the new product (which are effectively paid for by the customer any way.)

While I freely accept there are honest, committed and sincere financial planners, they are currently caught in an industry structure so tangled that it's hard to pick the good from the bad.

And before those honest planners start crying foul about unfair generalisations, it's worth remembering that everything written above is based on criticism levelled by other financial planners.

These are not practices that appear in submissions made to the Corporations and Financial Services parliamentary committee currently charged with implementing change.

But it is worth spelling them out in some detail because they are practices that have threatened the integrity of the industry as a whole.

Both the industry and the parliamentary committee need to understand these practices and how they developed to fully comprehend the need for change. Let's hope they then make changes that put the industry on a completely new footing.


p/s photos: Fiona Xie

Fitch Downgrade Malaysia's Debt - Consequences & Rationale


On June 10, 2009 Fitch downgraded Malaysia's long term local currency credit rating from A+ to A. However for Malaysia's outlook, it has upgraded it from negative to stable.
  • Rating agencies have voiced concerns about Malaysia's increasing fiscal deficit and impact on long-term yields. But bond issues have received a good response so far and policy rate cuts coming to an end is also a positive. Risks might be limited for investors as yields have improved and Malaysia has a sound external balance and forex reserve position
  • Fitch (June 10): Malaysia’s long-term local currency credit rating downgraded from 'A+' to 'A' and its outlook revised from negative to stable. This was led by high govt expenditures including two fiscal stimulus packages, falling govt revenues, slow tax reforms and rise in fiscal and primary deficits. But long-term foreign currency rating was maintained at 'A-' with a stable outlook
  • The downgrade is consistent with rating deterioration in some "AAA" countries like Japan and the UK. But it has little implication for Malaysia's fiscal deficit financing in the international market since debt can be financed domestically due to ample liquidity
  • S&P: Stimulus package would not affect Malaysia's A-minus foreign currency rating. Stable outlook as it has the capacity to pursue counter-cyclical fiscal policies. Malaysia will be able to fund large fiscal deficit entirely from domestic sources as they had done in the past due to its deep and liquid domestic capital markets
  • Moody's: 'A3' on high govt debt; S&P foreign-currency rating at 'A-' with a 'stable' outlook on strong external position and high savings rates
  • Rising Bond Issues:

  • Combined two stimulus plans so far would widen budget deficit to 7.6% of GDP in 2009 (the biggest since 1987) or even close to 10% of GDP. Govt. debt might increase to 46% of GDP in 2009 from 41% in 2008 (govt debt: 92.7% as domestic debt and 7.3% as foreign debt). While the first stimulus would be financed from the savings derived from cuts in the fuel subsidies, with the second stimulus and risk of rising deficit, the govt has decided to issue bonds starting January 2009 including foreign bond issues. The government raised RM60 billion from domestic debt sales in 2008 versus RM53 billion in 2007
  • From January to May 2009, total sales of government bond have surged by 79% y/y to RM 35billion. Central bank plans to hold 27 govt bond sales in 2009 incl. notes maturing in 3, 5, 10 and 20 years, and sell 5 billion ringgit in Islamic savings bonds
  • May 14, 2009 : Malaysia sold US$ 1.3billion (RM 4.5billion) of April 2014 notes at an average yield of 3.879%, which was higher than 3.735% at previous auction in March 2009 and 2.634% in January 2009
  • March 12, 2009 : Malaysia held the biggest debt auction in 5 yrs selling RM4.5bn ($1.21bn) of securities maturing in April 2014
  • Impact on yields curve: yield Demanded by investors has increased due to record government debt supply. Improved liquidity conditions and recent rate cuts to low levels and bond issues to finance the budget deficit have steepened the yield curve. However, rate cuts may have come to an end while bond issues will continue to flood the market ahead
  • Because of the sharp increase in bond supply in 2009 due to fiscal deficit, the MGS curve has gained in convexity. The curve is now extremely steep at the front end (3Y-5Y segment) and extremely flat at the long end (5Y-10Y segment). With the rate cut cycle having come to an end and given signs that economic activity may have bottomed, the outlook for MGS has become more bearish
  • Liquidity conditions remain supportive of the MGS while scope for a flattening of the curve is limited by upside risk to fiscal spending. Negative swap spreads (IRS-MGS) at the front end narrowed further in the past month on receding hopes of further rate cuts but near-term supply concerns could see the market anomaly persisting for longer
  • Malaysian government bonds are not attractive due to high debt supply and low possibility of further interest rate by central bank

p/s photos: Fiona Xie

Update On Marketocracy Portfolio



Fund Performance for salvadordali's Mutual Fund
left curve fund rankings right curve


For the six month period ending March 31, 2009 your fund outperformed 97.8% of the other funds on our site. Your forum and other privileges are based on this ranking


My portfolio was started on 1st August 2008. Marketocracy lets you manage a virtual portfolio of $1M in a simulated trading environment, allowing you to track your performance accurately and compare your fund management skills to other investors and professional fund managers. Yes, they do take into account transaction cost as well. If your track record turns out to be one of the best, you could be hired to help manage a real fund at Marketocracy. It's a great place to learn, and a great place to prove your talent. They also have important rules to ensure that you are running an actual investing portfolio and not just sitting on cash:
  • No position can exceed 25% of your total portfolio value.
  • Half your portfolio must be comprised of positions under 10% each.
  • Your cash position isn't limited by this guideline, although you must be 65% invested
My fund was smartly called SMF, or Salvador Mutual Fund (no, not the foul language acronyms you are thinking). So far so good, although the first couple of months was iffy. SMF fund performance in orange colour.

The main objective of the fund is to beat the S&P 500. For the past 6 months ended 30 April, the S&P 500 has gained 1.33% while my fund has gained 51.1%. For the 6 months ended May 31 the S&P 500 has gained 4.05% while my fund has gained 60.64%.There are usually rules which dictate that you must be at least 65% invested at all time, and your aim is to beat the index. If you can consistently beat the index, you should be golden. If you look at the turnover rates, I have increased the trading activity over the past two months as I think the recovery is still volatile and is more suited to be traded.

modern portfolio theory, you basically aim to beat the index, based on the premise that:


over the long run stocks offer superior returns


hence if you consistently beat the index, over the long run, you should have superior returns


recent returns right curve


RETURNS
Last Week 6.78%
Last Month 18.61%
Last 3 Months 79.46%
Last 6 Months 64.69%
Last 12 Months N/A
Last 2 Years N/A
Last 3 Years N/A
Last 5 Years N/A
Since Inception 10.38%
(Annualized) 12.38%
S&P500 RETURNS
Last Week 3.66%
Last Month 5.50%
Last 3 Months 25.83%
Last 6 Months 4.05%
Last 12 Months N/A
Last 2 Years N/A
Last 3 Years N/A
Last 5 Years N/A
Since Inception -25.14%
(Annualized) -28.97%


RETURNS VS S&P500
Last Week 3.12%
Last Month 13.11%
Last 3 Months 53.62%
Last 6 Months 60.64%
Last 12 Months N/A
Last 2 Years N/A
Last 3 Years N/A
Last 5 Years N/A
Since Inception 35.52%
(Annualized) 41.34%
graph of fund vs. market indexes
SMF m100 S&P 500 DJIA Nasdaq
left curve recent returns vs. major indexes right curve



Today MTD QTD YTD
SMF 4.78% 16.36% 45.55% 53.16%
S&P 500 2.57% 0.00% 15.70% 2.96%
DOW 2.44% 0.00% 11.72% -3.15%
Nasdaq 2.84% 0.00% 16.08% 12.51%



alpha/beta vs. S&P500 right curve


Alpha 57.32%
Beta 1.27
R-Squared 0.84



left curve turnover right curve


Last Month 12.44%
Last 3 Months 210.83%
Last 6 Months 256.59%



Symbol Price Value Portion of Fund Gains Inception Return
EXM $11.22 $67,320.00 5.82% $58,738.60 61.88%
ERX $39.19 $156,760.00 13.55% $64,963.22 40.25%
STT $47.35 $118,375.00 10.23% $38,918.54 38.54%
BAC $11.62 $69,722.40 6.03% $29,815.62 22.44%
GCH $12.57 $89,962.77 7.78% $18,502.31 21.12%
WFR $20.99 $125,940.00 10.89% $20,176.56 19.08%
F $6.13 $122,600.00 10.60% $14,535.62 13.45%
ACTG $5.70 $68,400.00 5.91% $12,530.70 13.12%
DLTR $45.62 $71,167.20 6.15% $7,465.94 9.01%
QSII $49.99 $49,990.00 4.32% $7,098.72 7.51%
SXE $27.75 $83,250.00 7.20% -$4,710.47 -5.36%
DZZ $19.38 $48,449.25 4.19% -$5,578.06 -10.32%


p/s photo: Fiona Xie
Copyright © Long Term Payday Loans. All Rights Reserved.
Blogger Template designed by Click Bank Engine.