Showing posts with label Zhou Wei Tong. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Zhou Wei Tong. Show all posts

HK IPOs Sizzling Hot




HK's IPO market has surpassed other financial centers by the proverbial mile this year. The liquidity arriving into HK from China and from the US carry trade have helped fuel the boom. The thing that sets this event apart is the proximity to the recent global crisis, and the pent up demand to raise cash by many large companies. Again, as I have warned before, I am quite uncomfortable with the upcoming UC Rusal IPO, a highly questionable and large IPO. Things could be derailed very swiftly if things do not go as planned.

The Standard: Hong Kong is now the world's premier destination for initial public offerings, having raised US$13.82 billion (HK$107.79 billion) in the first 10 months of the year.

Shanghai along with the increasingly hot Brazilian stock exchanges as well as New York were left in the wake of Hong Kong by the end of October, according to the World Federation of Exchanges after its latest month-by-month review.

Hong Kong was ranked top as the largest listing market by fund-raising size, the federation revealed. In taking the No 1 spot, it knocked the Shanghai exchange from the perch it had occupied for three straight months since July. Shanghai's IPO take for the year now stands at US$12.37 billion.

Yet funds being raised are still comparatively modest when compared to the 2006 and 2007 golden years - a period that was brought to a crashing end by the financial tsunami. In each of those years, the Hong Kong exchange counted more than HK$300 billion, driven by heavyweight listing candidates such as Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (1398). That raised HK$124.9 billion in 2006.

Hong Kong is now seeing investment capital pouring into the listing market "as there is no other way to go due to the low interest rate," said Bright Smart Securities general manager Nelson Chan Kai-fung.

The number of offerings this year to yesterday was 62 percent up on last year. Forty-seven companies have turned to Hong Kong this year for flotations, and two-thirds of them were listed in the July

-November period, according to Hong Kong Exchanges and Clearing (0388). "I believe the number of listing candidates will continue to climb in early 2010," said Prudential Brokerage's Mark To.

Companies are eager to cash in on market liquidity "before the central banks tighten monetary policy in the wake of economic recovery," To added. The surge in listings is also expected to continue next year because the SAR is considered a main beneficiary of efforts by the mainland to maintain its momentum. Indeed, brokers see China as the economy with the most growth potential. "The world is looking to tap the China market, and Hong Kong is the place which enables other economies to have access to it," To said. "Nearly 99 percent of the listing candidates generate income from the mainland."

Chan has a similar reading on the potential for the Hong Kong market. He believes it will draw more listing candidates from other countries, helped by an intense effort by HKEx to attract overseas firms.

Continuing the trend, UC Rusal, the world's biggest aluminum maker, is likely to be the first Russian firm to list in Hong Kong. It has a listing hearing on Thursday. It hopes to dual list 10 percent of its shares in Hong Kong and Paris this year - a move with an estimated value of US$2 billion.


p/s photos: Zhou Weitong

Some Good Questions About Fund Managers & Owners




There are about 3,000 to 4,000 daily readers for this blog but you will find that there are not that many comments or queries. I guess part of the problem is that I do shoot down questions or queries that are not well thought out, lol... Anyway, a reader did posed some interesting questions on fund managers and company owners. I will try to answer as best I could.

Digital Investor

Hello Dali, had been following your blog quite awhile and beside writing about those stocks, maybe it is time that you reveal what fund manager trying to do in the market. Here are some of the things that we see in the market and I try to understand what they're trying to do. I had been asking around and no one seem to know why...maybe you could:

1. If you look at the daily bursa announcement, you can see that EPF will buy big qty of certain counters and sell it on the same day too or maybe few days later. Or they will sell and then buy back. In short, they're profiting from others instead of buying and hold. I dont see this happen with foreign funds investing in Bursa Malaysia. Although it is not illegal but dont you think that this is wrong way of fund management?
Comments: You will find big funds buying and selling the same shares in the same week, sometimes even in the same day. Usually, its to disguise their motives - they could be adding or selling positions. For some counters that are a bit illiquid, these funds are actually drumming up interest to offload or buy shares by being on both sides. Is it legal, its a gray area. Technically, if they pay full broke both ways and do not sell short, they are deemed OK, but a more vigilant regulator may see things differently. Is that "wrong", well that is hard to qualify, and really you cannot stop a fund from buying and selling if they pay full broke. I do agree that this gray area is more likely to be "wrong" as it helps to paint a distorted picture of the real activity behind these operations. If I was the regulator, I would keep a closer eye and try to wipe that out of the system as it affects the integrity of the market place.

2. The other "unhealthy" process happen in Bursa is blocking a particular counter price from going up or going down by parking big qty in the sell queue or buy queue. One good counter you can see this happen is with ytlpower. What is the purpose? Dont they want their share price to go up? For today, it is with Genting Malaysia, big sell and buy qty being park there and basically the price got no where to go.
Comments: Usually you can only park the shares, if you have the shares already, you certainly do not want to be caught short if these big sells get taken out. Again, you cannot stop people from parking big sizes to "deter prices from rising". Why would company owners want to do that, or it could be a substantial shareholder, or just a fund with a big position ... - they could be waiting to collect more shares, they could be "maintaining price trends" for a corporate action (rights issue, share placement, share issuance), or that they just do not think it is "time for action".
Another possibility is due to the market makers of called warrants, they have hedged positions and depending on their exposure, they may want to do that as well. Again, very legal, if you have the balls and resources, take them out, but I am sure they would be covered. To them, its not important if the shares go up or down as long as they are covered.

3. Another method is to buy and sell big qty at basically the same price. What is the purpose? Dont they hv to pay broker fees?
Comments: Same as the first question.


p/s photos: Zhou Weitong

Top US Universities' Endowment Fund In Deep Trouble



Article from NYT:

Steep investment losses have caused painful cutbacks at some of the best-known universities over the most recent fiscal year and have prompted questions about whether their endowments are taking too much risk. But as the schools, one by one, disclose their numbers, the managers of these endowments are indicating their continued support for a diversified portfolio chock full of alternative investments like hedge funds, private equity and real estate — the very things that have caused so much trouble.

This portfolio strategy is sometimes called the Swensen model, after David F. Swensen, who heads the Yale endowment. On last Tuesday, Yale disclosed the details of its year, reporting an investment loss of 24.6 percent, compared with an average drop of 17.2 percent for large funds, according to the Wilshire Trust Universe Comparison Service. The fiscal year for all major university endowments ended on June 30.

Preferring to emphasize their long-term results, the chiefs of many big endowments, including Harvard, Yale and M.I.T., have indicated they are sticking with their models. Notably, Mr. Swensen did not lay out Yale’s asset allocation for the coming year in his statement — something he has done in years past. Yale pointed out that even after its latest loss, it has produced an average annualized gain of 11.8 percent over the last 10 years. According to Wilshire, the average return during that period was 4.3 percent for endowments with more than $1 billion in assets. Just how unhappy fiduciaries are with the returns last year depends on whether they are focusing on one-year returns or 10-year returns.

A number of institutions will be looking for ways to avoid some of last year’s biggest headaches, like not having enough cash on hand to meet capital calls, as required under their contracts with private equity and similar funds. Harvard, which was down 27.3 percent last year, has acknowledged it suffered a cash squeeze and has since raised its portion in cash, among other measures.

“In most cases they will make small changes in the allocation to various categories,” said Byron Wien, vice chairman of Blackstone Advisory Services. “People are gradualists.” Along with holding more cash, Mr. Wien says he believes that endowments need to have more funds in emerging markets and in the credit markets as growth slows in the western world.

The biggest endowments seem to have stumbled the most in percentage terms last year. Doing better than either Harvard or Yale, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology said that its fund fell a more modest 17 percent and that its diversification strategy of embracing alternative investments had indeed cushioned its portfolio, a third the size of Harvard’s, against the market swoon.

By contrast, Yale said that diversification had failed to protect its asset values. The biggest drag on its performance was a 34 percent decline in its largest asset class, known as real assets, which include real estate, commodities and timber. Over all, the Yale fund fell to $16.3 billion at the end of June. That decline included a $5.6 billion loss from investments, $1.2 billion that was applied to the university’s budget and $200 million in new gifts.

Some big schools remain skeptical about the push for alternative investments. TheUniversity of Pennsylvania did relatively well in an abysmal year, reporting a drop of 15.7 percent, and did not have a lot invested in private equity, real estate and natural resources. The school’s endowment chief, Kristin Gilbertson, said that she had been slow to get into private equity and real estate after she took over in 2004 because she worried that the size of private equity funds was too large and their fees too high. Over a five-year period, Penn had an average annualized return of 3.5 percent. That compares with 8.7 percent at Yale. Still, Ms. Gilbertson says she is in a better position for growth now, partly because the fund has avoided some of the problems that will continue as a result of private equity deals struck from 2005 through 2007.


p/s photo: Zhou Wei Tong

The Path - Why I Like KurniaAsia (A Lot)



KurniaAsia has had a turbulent 3-4 year period. It was and is still the top general insurance company in the country, an enviable position, but something happened along the way, it sputtered and stuttered as it did not realign their portfolio to a more balanced one that is more risk commensurate and risk viable. It has the network, it has the reach, but it did not have the cohesiveness as the business model was slanted.
Although KurniaAsia calls itself as Malaysia’s largest general insurer, it derived over 86% of its gross premium income in FY08 from the motor business.The financial year ended June 2008 (FY08) was a year to forget for KurniaAsia. Less than four years after its listing on the main board, it reported a net loss of about RM300mil, due mainly to an underwriting deficit of some RM400mil. The company has since pumped in another RM400m capital.

year net profit / market cap
2004 RM53.7m / RM1.9bn

2005 RM102.7m
2006 RM29.8m
2007 RM5.8m / RM1.7bn
2008 (RM301.8m) / RM0.8bn
2009 estd. RM50m

Just looking at the net profit figures through the year would reveal a startling trend. The motor insurance business gives an uneven earnings trend, and would put the company to take some exceptional risk in its business model. Institutional investors and analysts do not like haphazard earnings and uncertainty in claims / writeoffs. KurniaAsia was a lumbering giant that did not know what to do with its resources and penetration abilities.

The last 12 months was a sight to behold for those who have been following the company. Its like an MBA textbook case of successful management revamp. You can talk to anyone within KurniaAsia and they all can sense and feel the deep culture and management changes.
The group adopted the transformation theme when it appointed Capt K.H. Chia as the chief executive officer and managing director of Kurnia Insurans last July. The 30-year veteran of the insurance industry started as a life insurance agent and was previously the CEO of Citic-Prudential in China.

Management consulting firm McKinsey & Co was hired two years ago to provide advice and that led to the launch of Kurnia Asia’s Transformation of Operations and Performance (TOP) programme in July 2007. Says Chia: “Another thing that convinced me was he (Kua, the controlling shareholder) showed me the thick report by McKinsey. I agreed with a lot of things inside the report. These are critical areas and it’s challenging to execute the recommendations.”

An indication of the group’s intent to become less reliant on its motor portfolio is the fact that it now has a general manager (GM) in charge of the non-motor products. It is also looking to strengthen the selling of its products by others. Hence, it has GMs to oversee agency distribution and alternative distribution. When assembling the team, Chia felt it was important to have an impressive line-up and thus has identified people who are well-regarded in the industry. It is no wonder then that KurniaAsia’s management expenses for the first quarter ended September 2008 increased 2.7% from a year ago, largely because of the expansion of the Kurnia Insurans’ senior management team.

People in the industry would have noticed these dramatic changes in the way KurniaAsia conduct their business:
a) Now, they try to settle claims as quickly as they can (within 15 months), instead of dragging it out for as long as they can (which was their previous strategy) as they found the compounded interest cost (8% p.a.) was a killer and Malaysian courts usually favour the plaintiffs anyway.

b) They are concentrating on building the non-motor business, recognising the much better claims experience (for e.g., household fire claims ratio is around 5% only)

c) Phasing out declining non-profitable business. Previously, they were focused on volume and tried to "manage the portfolio" as it grew, but obviously, it didn't work.

d) Beefing up Kurnia's "Auto Assist" to include motorbikes which are supposed to arrive at the scene of accident/breakdown within 15 minutes of the call. They are trying to make this their key competitive advantage vis-a-vis other insurers. Of course they will still have their normal tow trucks and cars but motorcyles are the key "new" difference.

e) Setting up 300-400 workshops as "Kurnia express" touchpoints where customers can bring their vehicles after the accidents for immediate assessment and settlement (before the repair work is done) for own damage claims up to RM5,000. The cheque goes straight to the customer, not the workshop, so the incentive is for the customer to keep the repair costs as low as possible. More than 50% of their claims are less than RM5,000.

f) Reconfiguring and downsizing their branch network, replacing them with touchpoints at their panel workshops. This should help reduce costs. Kurnia is bringing potential customers to their doorsteps - it is up to them to convince the customers to use their cheques there.

What is a good company? Why do we like certain companies? A company can stay undervalued for the longest time if there are no catalysts to change the path the company is on. KurniaAsia basically had a Christian-like born again experience. It saw that it did not have the management leadership to change its business model, the management will (or rather the lack of) to revamp the way things were being done - it was under leveraging its massive network. The board hired the right person to effect those changes.

By doing that, it puts the company onto a "sustainable growth and value-add path". Maintaining that discipline would easily push the market cap of the company way past what it had achieved as a high in the past. It went as high as RM1.9bn in market cap before on a under leveraged business model. Taking RM2bn as the new market cap target, on 1.5bn shares, I think KurniaAsia is strong buy and hold till it hits RM2bn / 1.5bn shares = RM1.33 per share. Considering it is currently just RM0.56 a share, you can do the math.

Earnings should more than double next year, which would bring the PER down to 6x-7x (based on a combined ratio of 96% vs 99% in the last q). A tariff revision should bring this combined ratio down even further and enhance the overall profitability of the business. The previous transformation programme called Transformation of
Operations and Performance (TOP), launched in Jul 07, was completed in Jun 09. It is now replaced by a new plan, dubbed Mission 15.

Overall, TOP has yielded the
following positive results by June 09:
  • Agency turnaround programme – RM48.3m savings from the reduction of unprofitable business realised from Jul to end-Jun 09.
  • 312 unprofitable motorcycle agents suspended.
  • Unprofitable agents barred from issuing unprofitable third-party policies.
  • Sales stimulation programme – RM9.8m impact from the increase in profitable motor policies and business from newly recruited agents.
  • 506 new productive agents recruited.
  • Motor comprehensive renewal campaign – RM2.7m impact through an increase in renewal cases.
  • Risk selection enhancement – RM30.9m savings achieved through initiatives to enhance risk selection.
  • Claims process enhancement – own damage (OD) adjuster waiver – RM1.1m savings in adjuster fees achieved.
  • Claims process enhancement – OD factory / firm – overall OD claims approval within seven days of 76% compared to 56% in FY07-08; RM2.3m savings achieved through lower OD claims payout by reducing leakages.
  • Claims process enhancement – third party bodily injury (TPBI) – RM4m impact from BI settlement strategy (to accelerate settlement of outstanding cases to avoid paying more in the future); RM3.4m savings achieved from fewer solicitor appointments due to direct settlement approach.
  • Claims process enhancement – third party property damage (TPPD) – average payout amount is 4.8% lower in Jun 09 compared to FY07-08 through reduction of leakages; RM2.7m achieved as at 30 Jun 09.
  • Fraud investigation unit (FIU) – RM4.2m saved.
  • Increase in comprehensive policy – private car third-party policy ratio dropped to 31% from 46% in FY07/08; commercial vehicle third-party policy ratio dropped from 61% to 30%.
Mission 15
The group launched its second wave transformation programme
Mission 15 in Jul 09. The four objectives for the programme are:
• Enhancing customers/agents’ experience through simpler processes with fewer
errors
• Improving employee satisfaction through clear, focused jobs and elimination of
low value-added tasks
• Creating a culture of performance by enabling rewards through superior
economics and regulatory compliance
• Creating profit and loss capacity to invest in new value creating initiatives and
hiring top talent for critical roles

Mission 15 focuses on the following areas:

• Branch and operations – operations centralisation; branch reconfiguration;
marketing executive coverage
• Claims management – Kurnia Express redesign; claims redesign; Kurnia Auto
Assist (KAA) redesign
• Alternative channels developments

• Other initiatives – collections; real estate monetisation; supporting functions
redesign 3-5 year aspirations.

With the transformation programme in place, the management is targeting to achieve the following five aspirations over the next 3-5 years:

• Combined ratio (including claims, commission and management expense) of 90% vs. 98% in FY09

• Motor and non-motor mix of 65:35 vs. 82:18 in FY09
• Achieve and maintain management expense of 15% vs. 22% in FY09

• Increase contribution from alternative distribution channels to 20%, from only 6-7% currently (93-94% sales via agency force)

• Maintain a leading market position; the group currently has higher market shares of 9.8% for general insurance premium and 18.8% for motor insurance premium


These achievements were significant in revamping the philosophy and thinking behind their business mindset. Some of the improvements may be yielding only small sums of real monetary change but these are value accretive over the longer term, and what I would call the "path to professional success".
That's the internal revamp within KurniaAsia. Investors should start paying attention to the industry and the stock in particular because there are upcoming structural revamps for the local insurance industry as well.

1. BNM has already allowed Kurnia to turn away unprofitable third party policies (which allows claims of unlimited liability for bodily injury which are "long tailed" in nature) and policies covering commercial vehicles. Previously, if Kurnia turned away a bus, they would get a 'phone call' from BNM. When Kurnia started to decline 3rd party business, it appears that the other industry players also followed suit. All the unprofitable business is being channeled to MMIP, which is jointly owned by all the general insurers in town and charges 50% more than conventional policies. With MMIP, at least the 3rd party risk is shared among all and the premiums are higher. Kurnia's 3rd party policies are only 18% of overall policies (private car) vs 34% last year. Commercial 3rd party is down to 1/3 of the 35% done in 2008.


2. BNM is close to allowing them to revise motor tariffs, which have not been changed in the last 31 years. For e.g. 3rd party insurance in Malaysia for a married 28 yr old female costs USD38, vs USD68 in Thailand, USD189 in Indonesia and USD 873 in Singapore!


3. BNM may allow them to categorise theft as a separate insurance cover and priced according to the risk taken. Theft is a major issue for them.


4. BNM may allow the industry to limit the liability on 3rd party policies, which is a major positive as these are the costly suits which can drag on for years.

How not to like KurniaAsia!? RM0.55 vs RM1.33, I think that is achievable within the next 12 months.
Back to my target of 30% within 6 months, that should be a cinch. Hedge funds should really send me a cheque when this works out as planned. Finding a company that just makes money is too simple, one can buy a plot of land and plant oil palm and sell for profit, but how defensible is that business model - not very. It can be copied easily and there are many things you cannot get to the economies of scale side of things. The network, revenue, number of clients, penetration, brand's acceptance, etc... all constitute the infrastructure and assets of the company - whether they get deployed properly is up to management's leadership and execution of the right plans.

KurniaAsia just gets almost all the ticks in my list and as mentioned before, a company can be on a path to nowhere or somewhere ... take the various broking firms, each of these broking firms has "chosen a path to be on" by virtue of their thinking, the management's vision and the general professionalism of staff hired, every company has set out on a certain path, whether they do it deliberately or unwittingly ... ECM Libra, TA Securities, SJ Securities, OSK ... you get the same products at each firm, yes some are better capitalised but they all at one time were about the same size with the same capital. The path that each company has set for itself is very clear, you can almost predict where each of these companies will be in 5 years or 10 years time. Some will still be exactly the same, why??? Some would have grown compounded wise by 10% p.a.... why?

It is for these very reasons that I find KurniaAsia has steered itself onto the correct path of professionalism, improving its business model and defensibility of its net margins in the right product mix ... hard to see it not being top class company in the future. Most foreign firms research do not cover insurance stocks, as more and more people discover it, the price appreciation will reflect the changes made.

Sometimes you can have 10 buy reports and no sells on the one stock and the bloody stock still won't move - why, because anyone who wanted to buy would have bought, and all are waiting to sell to fresh buyers, it takes time to lure in fresh "capital".

A 'tarnished' counter would have lost many investors, just like KurniaAsia, its revamp and reinvention would gradually win them back, hence the uptrend will be more sustainable - how far ahead do you think we are to discover KurniaAsia now, and the impending structural changes for the insurance industry?


p/s photo: Zhou Weitong


China's Rising Reserves, US Fiscal & Current Account Deficits




The following is a summary of a good article by Michael Pettis on whether China's reserves goes to fund the US fiscal deficit:


Mainland China's foreign reserves surged to a record US$2.13 trillion at the end June2009, confirming concerns that speculative capital is flooding into the nation to bet on rising asset prices and a quick economic recovery. Reserves rose US$178 billion in the second quarter, the biggest quarterly increase on record and up from the US$1.95 trillion yuan at the end of March. Most of the increase was driven by the very large trade surplus and smaller but still high net FDI inflows, plus of course returns on the existing portfolio. However, there is the unexplained portion of the increase in reserves, which serves as a proxy for hot money, has turned from negative in the first quarter to
very positive in the second.

Hot money is pro-cyclical, and its effect will be to intensify growth in the short term, even as it increases volatility and makes monetary policy more difficult. China's central bank must recycle the net surplus on the current account and the capital account, and with the very high current account surplus, China would be creating a huge amount of domestic money just from that source. The fact that it is also running a large capital account surplus makes the central bank's monetary management that much more difficult. As long as this fiscal-stimulus-induced boom continues, hot money inflows will heat things up even more.

Does the fact that China has huge reserves mean that they will be buying loads of US Treasuries? Is China still funding the US deficit? Most people will not be differentiating between the
US fiscal deficit and the US current account deficit. China is mainly funding ONE of them, not both of them altogether. When we take things and argue, we must be clear on the details because we end up revealing how shallow and little we know of the subject matter.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc. estimates that US government borrowing may total US$3.25 trillion in the year ending Sept. 30, almost four times the US$892 billion in 2008, to finance the budget deficit. Here is an example of warped thinking and a poor grasp of economics :
“China’s reserves will allow the U.S. to run a higher fiscal deficit than other nations,” said Bilal Hafeez, the London-based global head of currency strategy at Deutsche Bank AG.

That is incorrect and flawed. The fact that China’s reserves have surged will in no way make it easier for the US to fund its fiscal deficit even though China has no choice but to invest these additional reserves in US Treasury bonds. Besides valuation changes and interest income, there are two reasons for the increase in the reserves – the very high trade surplus and net capital inflows into China. Take the second reason first. If money flows into China for investment purposes, it must flow out of somewhere else, and that somewhere else for the most part means the global pool of dollar savings which would anyway have been available to fund the US fiscal deficit directly or indirectly. China is acting like a unique bank that takes risk-seeking money and funnels it into low-risk assets. The USA profits from this intermediation while China runs a significant negative carry.

What about the dollars generated from the trade surplus and invested into US Treasury bonds? Won’t that help the US fund its fiscal deficit? Again the answer is no. The US government is not borrowing for abstract reasons, but rather is borrowing in order to spend locally to generate domestic employment. The amount of borrowing it needs to generate a fixed amount of domestic jobs is correlated with the US trade deficit, because it is through the trade deficit that domestic consumption “leaks out” to create jobs abroad. The higher the trade deficit, in other words, the more the US government needs to borrow to generate a fixed number of American jobs, and so the fact that China is reinvesting the dollars generated by the trade surplus with the US does not make it easier for the US to borrow since it simultaneously requires the US to borrow more. China does not fund the US fiscal deficit. It funds the US current account deficit, and it has no choice but to fund it. If the US wants China to buy US$1 trillion of new bonds every year all it has to do is ensure that the US runs a US$1 trillion trade deficit with China every year.

China may continue to bitch and scream about the Fed's printing press and the plethora of US Treasuries, but they will have to continue to buy and fund the US because the flip side of the coin does no one any good.


p/s photos: Zhou Weitong

Sigh .......


Saw this this morning in NST, see if you can spot the flaw:

-------------------------------

The number of Middle Eastern tourists visiting Malaysia this month and next could plunge by half based on initial data obtained from travel agencies.



Traditionally, more Arab tourists reach Malaysia in the third quarter alone than in the first half of the year. They also spend three times more than the average tourist. Based on the RM6,070 spending per person, a 50 per cent drop in arrivals could result in potential revenue loss of RM300 million for the country. While the tourism industry had expected a decline in arrivals given the shorter summer prior to the fasting month of Ramadan, they did not expect the number to be halved. Factors cited for the decline, apart from the global economic crisis and influenza A(H1N1), included the lack of advertisements in the Arab world this year.

In July-September last year, Middle East tourist arrivals fell 6.3 per cent to 108,665 from the comparable period in 2007.Travel agents are bracing for worse this year. Asia Overland Services Tour And Travels group managing director Anthony Wong said its inbound market from the Middle East had dropped 40-50 per cent.

"We used to bring in 18,000 to 22,000 in July and August. Now, we are not busy at all," he told Business Times. "This time around, we have been told by our agents in the Middle East that there has been a lack of advertisements compared to previous years," Wong said.

World Express Tours group president Tunku Iskandar Tunku Abdullah said that business at his agency had fallen 70 per cent in terms of tourist arrivals as well as value. "Currently, even forward booking is down due to the lack of advertisements in the Middle East," Tunku Iskandar said. He said that agents in the Middle East had told him that there had been a significant drop in advertisements on Malaysia compared to previous years. "They tell me that there is very little promotion that consumers can see compared to previously and to advertisements to other destinations like Thailand, Singapore and Australia."


Asia Experience Tours, touted as the largest agency for inbound travel from the Middle East, is expecting a more than 40 per cent drop in business in terms of tourist numbers and value. Its chief executive officer Ngiam Foon described this year as a "disaster", citing the economic crisis, H1N1 outbreak and other, better, deals offered by regional competitors. This year, they are not coming in big numbers," he said.

Calls to the secretary-general of the Ministry of Tourism went unanswered. It is understood that the advertisement and promotion budget alone for Middle East countries in 2007 and last year was around RM20 million. In reality, the amount is far more when the cost of its officers' fees, mega familiarisation programme, agent incentives and contributions from airlines are taken into account.

Last week, the Minister of Tourism revised downwards the projection for tourist arrivals this year to 19 million from 20 million.

--------------------

Who edited the piece? The headline was "Absent Ads Blamed For Fewer Arab Arrivals". Just because the tour agents said that ads were to be blamed for the drop in 2Q 2009 compared to 1Q 2009 arrivals, does not mean BT can absolve itself by making that as the headline. You can quote the agents but you must also have the journalistic integrity to comment that that is a flawed conclusion.

Any decent journalist or reader with average intelligence will be able to tell that there is this thing called the seasonal effect (maybe less holidays, better weather in Middle East, no bonuses in 2Q, etc.). It is wrong to say that a reduction in ads caused the 2Q figure to be lower than 1Q. In fact the 2Q 2009 figure was the higher compared to 2Q 2008 and 2Q 2007, which is better for comparison. If anything, the H1N1 is a major factor, and taking that into account, the arrivals figure in 2Q has been nothing short of amazing. The arrival figures should be lauded not derided.

Sigh.....


p/s photo: Zhou Wei Tong




China's Liquidity Traps & Benefits



China has been ramping up lending over the last 7 months. Yes, it was with good intentions. Yes, it was actual lending not just for show. Yes, banks in China were "asked" to do their bit to lend aggressively. While there is a lot of good to have money circulating around, it will also weigh down on those borrowing on the "unqualified" end of the spectrum, people who willing take on more debt than they should. Its a mini time bomb. No, it will not implode yet. What the figures below shows to me is that China's equity markets will have a major run up right through the end of 2009. When you pump in so much liquidity, there are very few places for it to surface. We may see a combustion effect only maybe in the second half of 2010.

China's credit card debt that was at least six months overdue rose 133.1 percent year on year in the first quarter to 4.97 billion yuan (727.67 million U.S. dollars), the People's Bank of China, or the central bank. Debt overdue by six months or more accounted for 3 percent of the total outstanding credit card debt at the end of March, or 0.6percentage point more than in the same period last year, the report said.

It warned of potential risks of the increasing overdue credit card debt as financial institutions expanded their credit card business. As of March 31, Chinese banks had issued more than 150 million credit cards, or 0.11 card per person, up 42.9 percent year on year. But Chinese consumers still have relatively few credit cards, compared with 4.39 per person in the United States and 0.95 in Brazil. Outstanding credit card loans rose 87.6 percent year-on-year to165.86 billion yuan at the end of March.







New bank loans in China will exceed 1 trillion yuan (US$146 billion) and may top 1.2 trillion yuan this month as the regulator expressed its concern over irresponsible lending, according to a newspaper report.

This month's figure may be the third-highest this year after March's and January's, the China Securities Journal reported yesterday, citing people it didn't identify. That would also represent a sharp jump from May's 664.5 billion yuan.

The news, coming in the wake of the central bank's remark on Thursday that it will stick to an appropriately loose monetary policy to support economic growth, sent bank shares higher yesterday on expectations of better profit.

Shanghai Pudong Development Bank gained 3.79 percent to 22.98 yuan while the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, the country's biggest lender, rose 2.02 percent to 5.55 yuan, easily outperforming the key Shanghai Composite Index.

Earlier this week, the China Banking Regulatory Commission demanded that lenders avoid a sudden jump in loans at the end of each month and each quarter, a move used by domestic banks to meet internal targets.

The regulator told lenders to ensure the money is channeled to the right sectors such as small businesses to help stimulate the economy, and to monitor capital flow into the stock and property markets.

This month's lending surge was mainly fueled by mortgage loans and funding of government projects, the Journal said.

The new bank loans in the first five months of the year have reached 5.84 trillion yuan, more than last year's total and exceeding the government's target of 5 trillion yuan for this year.


p/s photos: Zhou Weitong



A Quick Run-Through Of Global Real Estate Hotspots


Real estate is a cumbersome slow moving asset. Its not like stock prices which can move up and down a few percent on the same day. Real estate is however a reflection of liquidity, a wealth indicator, a confidence indicator, a leading indicator, and a lagging indicator as well, depending on how you argue and look at things. Hence it opportune to have a peek at some real estate hotspots to see if the surprising bull run ties in with the investing situation in real estate.

Australia

The Australian housing market downturn is likely to be milder than in the U.S., UK and EU in 2009. Australia's house price correction had a head start going back to 2003. Furthermore, housing demand from migrants to the commodities-rich west and the chronic housing shortage in eastern Australia will keep prices from stabilizing back at pre-boom levels unless Australia fails to avoid a deep recession. Indeed, building approvals and housing loans to owner-occupiers began to recover since October 2008 after the government doubled grants for first-time purchases of homes until December 2009. Mortgage interest rates fell to their lowest level in four decades after the Reserve Bank of Australia cut the overnight cash rate 425bp within a year to 3% in April 2009, the lowest since 1960. Tax cuts, government handouts and lower petrol prices will also raise the affordability of housing. Affordability may not mean higher house prices, though. Despite increased sales (new home sales in Q1 2009 rose 20% since end-2008), house prices fell 6.7% y/y in Q1 2009. Rising unemployment and lower household wealth will keep buying sentiment mild this year but, short of a deep recession, improved affordability and ongoing housing shortages will help Australia avoid a housing crash as bad as in the U.S. and Europe.


New Zealand

New Zealand housing market is in worse shape than Australia's but is also likely to avoid as deep a correction as in the U.S. and Europe. The Reserve Bank of New Zealand has cut 575bp since July 2008 to 2.5% in April 2009 but longer-term, fixed mortgage rates have recently begun to rise again due to expectations of a quick recovery and higher interest rates. Fiscal policy has been laissez-faire towards the recession, opting merely for tax cuts as the government would rather not stand in the way of the economy's structural adjustment. With housing assets 5.7 times the household disposable income, New Zealand property markets are even more leveraged than their U.S. counterparts. House prices fell 8% in 2008 and are down 9.2% y/y as of April 2009. Some analysts believe the housing market will bottom on an annual basis in 2009. The housing market has already bottomed on a month-over-month basis, with the median price rising from $325,000 in January 2009 to $340,000 in April. Immigration has revived housing demand and sales have been strongest in the low-end segment thanks to increased affordability. However, new building starts and new home sales remain below the boom levels of 2004 and will likely remain so due to credit constraints, rising unemployment and sluggish economic growth in the year ahead.


United Kingdom

The housing sector is one the most important factors affecting the economic slump in the UK, which is similar in many ways to the difficulties facing the U.S. economy. The latest data on the UK housing sector continues to be mixed but some analysts are tentative to call the bottom in Q2 2009. The latest Halifax price index fell 1.7% m/m in April with price levels back to 2004 readings. Nationwide data brought a 0.4% decline in April but the y/y contraction fell from 15.7% in March to 15% in April. Mortgage lending showed some signs of recovery in April according to the data from CML with a 9% m/m drop. Despite hopes of a recovery, lending is still 60% lower than a year. The monthly data could be quite volatile in the coming months, drawing a slow bottom-like pattern. A real recovery of the housing sector will depend on improvement in the personal income and employment situation in the economy, which are not yet foreseen.


Asia

Asia has witnessed sharp real estate correction led by the Asian Tigers, plus China, India and Vietnam. All these markets saw declining home and office prices and rentals, lower sales and rising vacancies. Prices are approaching fundamental values and slowing construction activity might somewhat close the estimated excess supply. But further price and rental correction are imminent. This because household and corporate demand will remain subdued in 2009 despite policy measures such as interest rate cuts and fiscal incentives as well as attractive discounts offered by realtors. Slowing or contracting consumer spending and rising job losses in most economies are hitting residential and retail markets. Slowing corporate earnings and capex, declining exports and liquidity crunch are weighing down on commercial real estate. Though banks are reducing exposure to the real estate sector, lower earnings among realtors and income pressures among consumers are raising the risk of delinquencies. Nonetheless, as the global liquidity crunch abates overtime, high growth potential and attractive returns, given rising incomes and urbanization in developing Asia, will revive domestic and foreign investor interests in Asia's real estate.

China

Unlike many global markets, the residential property market in China is showing some signs of stabilization. Significant price discounting, lower mortgage rates, incentives and overly ample credit extension are contributing to an increase in transactions and helping to reduce the existing inventory. Chinese property prices began falling in mid-2008 as anti-speculation measures and slower economic growth reduced investment. However, transactions could slow if authorities rein in lending growth in mid-2009. Commercial property has yet to show signs of recovery. The global capex retrenchment is also putting pressure on commercial property as it delays some expansion plans especially by foreign companies. Although domestic companies are somewhat less affected, a slower pace of consumption growth may weigh on both office and retail property markets.

HK

The HK real estate seems to be bubbling up again at least in terms of sales to investors as increased credit availability, and a weakening US and Hong Kong dollar, encourage investment. However, new tenants remain scarce and vacancies are on the rise, suggesting further downward pressure on prices, especially as Hong Kong’s economy, including the financial sector, continues to contract and consumption weakens.

India

Home prices in India have corrected 15% to as much as 40% in some prime areas since September 2008. The recent pick-up in demand due to discounts by realtors and mortgage rate cuts by banks will be largely outweighed by the excess supply of homes in the market. So another 15-20% price correction is underway in residential and office markets over the next 6-to-8 quarters. This is especially because bank lending standards have tightened, households face wealth erosion and slowing job market, affordability remains low and corporate sector faces liquidity pressures. Mall construction and rentals have taken a hit and so have activity and employment in the construction sector. Drying funding from foreign investors and domestic equity market is forcing the indebted real estate firms to divest shares to raise capital, hold back expansion plans, and refinance bank loans which has been helped by recent central bank measures.

Singapore

Singapore's real estate sector started moderating in Q2 2008 and home and office prices witnessed record decline of over 10% in Q1 2009 with rents also falling sharply. Another 15% to as much as 25% correction is expected in the residential sector and may be even higher in the luxury section. Woes in the financial and service sectors, negative wealth effects among households and shrinking population due to outflow of laid-off immigrants – all will weigh down on residential and retail real estate. This will be exacerbated by falling speculative investment due to tight domestic and foreign liquidity.

Vietnam

Vietnam's property prices are down over 30% in some markets with luxury section taking the biggest hit and office rentals showing steep decline. Though realtors have been cutting prices and banks are resuming lending, demand has been slow to pick up. Investors also remain reluctant to enter the market since they largely depend on foreign liquidity. The sector is unlikely to improve in 2009 and this will be exacerbated by lower investment via remittances and FDI.

Japan
Economic downside risk in Japan was highlighted when exports plummeted by 49% year-over-year in February. The steep decline in exports, a key driver of economic growth, stemmed from faltering global demand and the strong Japanese yen. Amid the dramatic drop in external trade, domestic consumption slowed in the quarter as well. The government reports that, on a year-over-year basis in February, household spending shrank 3.5% and retail sales contracted by 5.8%, the steepest decline in seven years. Imports declined 43%. Bank of Japan’s latest tankan survey in March shows that large manufacturers turned more pessimistic about business prospects, which does not bode well for industrial production or the labor market. Indeed, the unemployment rate rose to 4.4% in February, a three-year high. The excess capacity resulting from the collapse in demand and consumption has increased the risk of deflation. Headline inflation contracted by 0.1% in February. In one of the few bright spots in the Japanese economy, bank lending in Japan grew by nearly 4% year-over-year in January and February, much higher than the growth during the same months last year.
Commercial land values are falling. Land prices in the three major urban areas (Greater Tokyo, Nagoya and Osaka) in January declined by 5.4% year-over-year, the first drop in four years, according to the government. The decline was more pronounced in Greater Tokyo, where the government said that prices dropped 6.1% in January. Meanwhile, the tightened lending policies adopted by banks, coupled with the difficult business environment, have pushed up the number of companies filing for bankruptcy. In the first two months of 2009, corporate bankruptcies rose 25.5% over the previous year. That helped prompt a rise in office vacancy in Tokyo’s five wards to 6.1% in March, from 4.7% at year-end 2008. Vacancies are likely to rise further as companies consolidate their space requirements. Newly constructed buildings will be hard to fill as demand dwindles. We believe that weak demand will persist this year and competition for tenants will lead to more concessions from landlords – rental discounts, longer rent-free periods and other incentives. With demand for class-A office space likely to remain soft and rents under pressure, cap rates for class-A offices will likely rise in the quarters ahead, possibly by 10-30 bps. Commercial land prices will see further downside as well. Residential land prices are also falling. Land prices in the three major urban areas declined by 3.5% in January from a year ago, according to the government, which said that the decline was a bit steeper, 4.4%, in Greater Tokyo. The volume and velocity of transactions has slowed sharply. In Tokyo, only 621 new condominium units were marketed in January with a contract ratio of 67%. The number of unsold units stood at about 4,200 units at the end of January, almost double from a year ago. As part of the national budget for fiscal year 2009, the government has included steps to rejuvenate housing demand that include tax breaks of up to 6 million yen for home buyers who move into their property in 2009 or 2010. The amount of the tax break will be lowered gradually after 2010.

REIT Markets
REIT markets in Asia posted mixed results in the first quarter. REITs gained in Hong Kong (14%) and Malaysia (5.3%), but J-REITs and S-REITs posted negative returns, as investors raised concerns about refinancing issues. Still, REITs mostly outperformed the broader equity markets, possibly because investors were attracted by the deep discounts to net asset values (NAV) and higher dividend yields.


Total Returns, REITs vs. All Equities

1Q09 / 2008 / 2007 / 2006 / 2005

REITs

Hong Kong 14.0% / -28.9% / 10.4% / 9.8% / 2.0%
Japan -4.7% / -49.0% / -2.3% / 29.7% / 13.5%

Malaysia 5.3% / -14.8% / 17.8% / N.A. / N.A.

Singapore -1.1% / -56.1% / 2.8% / 57.9% / 22.2%

All Equities

Hong Kong 0.2% / -52.4% / 40.3% / 32.6% / 11.3%

Japan -8.9% / -41.4% / -11.3% / 2.9% / 47.4%

Malaysia 1.0% / -39.7% / 43.0% / 31.4% / 1.1%

Singapore -3.7% / -50.9% / 22.1% / 33.9% / 16.1%


Indeed REIT yield premiums ranged from 569 to 940 bps above long-term government bond yields. As of the end of March, the region had 83 REITs with a total market capitalization of US$44.4 billion, which is moderately down from US$45.2 billion at end of last year. The weighted average dividend yield fell by 30 bps in the first quarter, to 8.2%.


Market Cap and Dividend Yields of Asian REITs

No. of REITs / Market Cap (US$ bil.) / Average Dividend Yield / Risk-free Rate /* Risk Premium (bps)
Japan 41 / 26.28 / 7.03% / 1.34% / 569

Singapore 21 / 9.93 / 11.40% / 2.00% / 940

Hong Kong 7 / 6.92 / 7.80% / 1.93% / 587
Malaysia 11 /1.10 / 10.80% / 1.89% / 891

Korea 3 / 0.17 / 10.60% / 4.68% / 592


Total 83 / $44.4 / 8.20% (weighted average based on market cap)


p/s photos: Zhou Weitong



Copyright © Long Term Payday Loans. All Rights Reserved.
Blogger Template designed by Click Bank Engine.